Having stayed out of the SEIA fray thus far, and will remain out of it. I do find it important to note one of the issues mentioned in today’s CleanTechnica article. If the treasurer is truly being kept out of the loop at SEIA, out of the discussion about employee compensation, is it possible that the membership is being kept out of the loop on policy issues? SEIA has largely kept a democratic approach on policy but how much is being handled inside the pay-to-play board and even inside the executive inner circle?
News
- Gigaom: To reduce the cost of solar look to everything but the hardware
- CleanTechnica: Rattling The Cage At SEIA
- Forbes: First Solar CTO: Boosting Solar Market Growth
- Fortune: Cox chairman: We’ll pay employees to try solar power
- Solar Industry: Solar Converges With Cleantech And New Media
- Solar Power World: Is VOST A Tax On Solar — And Is That A Bad Thing?
- Forbes: These Are Not Your Father’s Solar Panels
Opinions
- CleanTechnica: Edison Electric Institute Members Lobbying For Solar Taxes
- GTM: So Who’s Still Funding Early-Stage Cleantech?
Have a great day!
Yann