SolarWakeup Podcast: Jon Carson, Obama’s 2008 National Field Director, Brings Solar To Illinois

By Yann Brandt, Managing Editor

In this episode of the Energy Wakeup podcast, we sat down with Jon Carson, founder of Trajectory Energy Partners, to discuss early solar project development in Illinois—and the politics of solar. Carson has spent nearly a lifetime in Illinois politics, first running Tammy Duckworth’s successful Congressional campaign and then was the field director and then national field director for President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign. So he knows a little about politics and how solar fits into our current political atmosphere.

Carson discusses the importance of grassroots campaigning in early stage solar development—meeting with citizens in the area where you want to do development but going far beyond politicians. He describes the hours he’s spent crisscrossing the Land of Lincoln in his car, doing his best to talk solar to the people that will be affected by the installation of a solar farm: abutting neighbors, influencers and other townspeople.

And, Carson says, when he puts in the time to make these connections, it turns out solar is a pretty easy sell in most areas of the state.

Listen to the whole fascinating discussion to hear Carson talk about where solar is in the national political discussion and how we can do an even better job of bringing our issues to the forefront—and how he is effectively entering the burgeoning Illinois market, one project at a time.

Alliant Energy Pledges To Eliminate Coal From Its Portfolio By 2050

By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

Days after announcing it would pay $110 million to get out of a contract that required it to buy power from an Iowa nuclear plant, Alliant Energy announced it was planning to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% and eliminate coal from its portfolio by 2050.

The Madison, Wisconsin-based utility that serves Iowa in addition to its home state made the announcement in its corporate sustainability report.

[wds id=”3″]

The company says it plans to spend $2 billion on new renewable investments including wind and solar, including doubling the number of wind sites from six to 12 (some of which, as we reported last week, will go to offset the retirement of the nuclear plant). They also pledged that renewables would make up 30% of the utility’s total generation portfolio by 2030.

Alliant Energy Chairman and CEO Patricia Kampling said:

Alliant Energy is acting today to create a better tomorrow for our customers and communities,” said “We are transforming our energy fleet with an eye on customer cost, carbon reduction and providing cleaner and reliable power to the communities we serve.

One of the most interesting parts of the press release announcing the plan was this:

These actions will enable Alliant Energy to exceed carbon reduction goals pledged originally by the U.S. under the voluntary United Nations Paris Accord. While the Accord calls for reducing carbon 32 percent below 2005 levels by 2030, Alliant Energy’s plans enable a 40 percent reduction by that time.

It also announced Dubuque community solar garden is the first Envision® Platinum-rated solar project in the nation.

The bottom line is this: Clearly, President Donald Trump’s decision to pull out of the Paris Accord has not stopped the U.S. business community – including utilities directly affected by the greenhouse-gas emission targets – from continuing efforts to make sure those goals are met and (in the case of Alliant Energy, for example) exceeded. And the clean energy revolution, whether that’s wind or solar, is continuing along below the surface without no signs of abating.

Maybe it’s time for the federal government to realize that it’s time to stop fighting rearguard actions to save underperforming and ill-performing coal and nuclear plants. It’s simple really; all they’d have to do is follow Alliant Energy’s lead.

Georgia Group Offers Model Solar Zoning Guide To Streamline Project Siting

By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

Solar power is expanding its reach throughout the country rapidly – so rapidly, in fact, that some communities are struggling with issues like permitting, siting and other ancillary-but-essential parts of the project process. In some states, that confusion is causing communities to reject solar out of hand as being too complicated to do.

A group of researchers out of Emory University in Atlanta, seeing the problems that were arising as its own state moved speedily to a solar future, decided to do something to mitigate the struggles by publishing a sample zoning ordinance for municipalities thinking about going solar, which includes a Georgia Model Solar Zoning Ordinance and accompanying educational guide.

Publicity for the guide kicked off today with an Op-Ed in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

[wds id=”3″]

The authors, Caroline Reiser and Mindy Goldstein, write:

We’re started down the right path in Georgia. But to make sure we don’t get misdirected, clear land use standards and good information about solar development are necessary. The Georgia Model Solar Zoning Ordinance we just published paves the way.

These are not just issues in Georgia, of course. But the guide comes only a few days after Georgia Power announced it was soliciting 100 MW worth of distributed generation projects, which means more projects in small towns around the state. The guide is an effort to head of NIMBY-ism and help everyone understand best practices when it comes to siting solar projects in the state.

As the authors put it in their AJC piece:

We’ve already seen communities push back against solar development planned in inappropriate locations. The question is what comes next. … Georgia may be running down the right path, but it still can get tripped up. If Georgia wants it keep up the pace, it has to get smart.

More states need to come up with similar guidelines because solar is coming soon to your town – and it’s best that you be prepared rather than let it take you by surprise.

ACC Insider Dealing Throws Shade on Arizona Solar Market

By Frank Andorka, Senior Correspondent

The invaluable Ryan Randazzo at AZCentral.com revealed today that the executive director of the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC), which oversees public utilities in the state, has had to resign because his wife worked for the lobbying firm that represents – wait for it – the state’s largest utility, Arizona Public Service.

Although there is no evidence of direct influence, the scent of conflicted interests surrounding Executive Director Tom Vogt was so strong that he resigned ahead of an emergency meeting the commissioners had called to discuss whether he had in fact violated state law by not disclosing his wife’s job.

[wds id=”3″]

Vogt was a strange choice as executive director when he joined the commission in January 2017. As I wrote at the time for pv magazine, his resume was pretty thin:

Vogt’s resume is longer, but his energy experience is even thinner than Forese’s. After a five-year career as an investment banker, Vogt entered the Air Force as an intelligence officer and served in Iraq and Afghanistan. He then joined then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s staff as a daily intelligence briefer.

Vogt served three years as an Arizona representative and led the state’s Department of Veterans’ Services before Monday’s appointment. His most notable legislative achievements focused on veterans’ issues and not on energy. He is also a member of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a conservative policy shop whose anti-solar stances are legendary.

Given the information Randazzo uncovered, is it really any surprise that the solar industry in, mind you, a state with the highest insolation rates in the country is struggling? Vogt is not the first commissioner to have ties to APS, and APS has not been shy about spreading its money around in commissioner races in the past. It’s nice to see some accountability finally being put in place for these conflicts, but Vogt isn’t the only compromised member of the commission. It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the long run.

It should also be noted that Vogt’s resignation comes shortly after Commissioner Andy Tobin put forth a proposal to raise Arizona’s RPS to 80% by 2050 to counter a proposal by progressive billionaire Tom Steyer to raise the RPS to 50% by 2030.

The difference between the two proposals is that Tobin’s is significantly more friendly to APS than Steyer’s plan, in that it considers nuclear power to be “clean energy.” APS currently owns two nuclear plants in the state and is the only utility to do so.

More:

Solar neophytes join ACC as its new leaders

Arizona Regulator Wants To Get Ahead Of The Voters (And That May Be OK)